Angular distribution of jets are measured
to study the distributions of the outgoing partons
and to gain understanding of the parton dynamics of the
underlying sub-processes. As described in section 2.3
different types of resolved
processes are expected to contribute.
In the case of excitation diagrams (fig.5c-d)
both quark and gluon propagators are possible.
In exchange
(fig.5d in section 2.3),
the spin
propagator of the gluon leads to a steeper angular dependence
(
(
)
) than for
quark exchange (
(
)).
Figures 26c-f show the differential
cross section
for both direct (
)
and resolved enriched (
)
samples [17].
Here,
is the angle between the charm-jet axis
and the
-beam direction in the dijet rest frame.
The charm jet is identified by association of the
meson with the
jet using a criterion
.
Positive (negative) values of
correspond to cases in which the
identified charm jet, which is associated to the reconstructed
meson,
is oriented in the direction of the incoming proton (photon).
The shaded areas for
and
are, respectively, the contamination
of the genuine direct and resolved PYTHIA contributions.
The measured differential cross sections
for both samples are significantly
different. For
a
particular enhancement of the cross section for
charm jets is seen in the photon direction (negative
).
In contrast, in the region
the angular
distributions reveal a much shallower behaviour.
The differences provide an indication that a sizable fraction of the
resolved photon events proceeds via gluon exchange for which a steep
angular distribution is expected.
![]() |
New preliminary results are available
for the angular correlations in azimuth in charmed photoproduction events containing jets.
In leading order the
distribution is expected to show a sharp peak at
.
Contributions from higher orders, i.e. hard gluon radiation, as well as fragmentation and
detector resolution effects smear the distributions out.
The ZEUS experiment uses a dijet sample to measure the difference
of the two
jets [25] while H1 measures the difference between the reconstructed
meson and the leading jet which does not belong to the
meson [9].
In fig27 the two measurements are shown, revealing similar features.
The data have a shallower behaviour in
than the theories,
indicating that the theories, at next-to-leading order, can not fully account
for the amount of gluon radiation seen in the data.