Angular distribution of jets are measured to study the distributions of the outgoing partons and to gain understanding of the parton dynamics of the underlying sub-processes. As described in section 2.3 different types of resolved processes are expected to contribute. In the case of excitation diagrams (fig.5c-d) both quark and gluon propagators are possible. In exchange (fig.5d in section 2.3), the spin propagator of the gluon leads to a steeper angular dependence ( ( )) than for quark exchange ( ( )).
Figures 26c-f show the differential cross section for both direct ( ) and resolved enriched ( ) samples [17]. Here, is the angle between the charm-jet axis and the -beam direction in the dijet rest frame. The charm jet is identified by association of the meson with the jet using a criterion . Positive (negative) values of correspond to cases in which the identified charm jet, which is associated to the reconstructed meson, is oriented in the direction of the incoming proton (photon). The shaded areas for and are, respectively, the contamination of the genuine direct and resolved PYTHIA contributions. The measured differential cross sections for both samples are significantly different. For a particular enhancement of the cross section for charm jets is seen in the photon direction (negative ). In contrast, in the region the angular distributions reveal a much shallower behaviour. The differences provide an indication that a sizable fraction of the resolved photon events proceeds via gluon exchange for which a steep angular distribution is expected.
New preliminary results are available for the angular correlations in azimuth in charmed photoproduction events containing jets. In leading order the distribution is expected to show a sharp peak at . Contributions from higher orders, i.e. hard gluon radiation, as well as fragmentation and detector resolution effects smear the distributions out. The ZEUS experiment uses a dijet sample to measure the difference of the two jets [25] while H1 measures the difference between the reconstructed meson and the leading jet which does not belong to the meson [9]. In fig27 the two measurements are shown, revealing similar features. The data have a shallower behaviour in than the theories, indicating that the theories, at next-to-leading order, can not fully account for the amount of gluon radiation seen in the data.